Newsgroups: *rec.music.classical.guitar*
From: *William D Clinger <cesur...
Date: *Sat, 28 Jun 2008 07:43:20 -0700 (PDT)*
Subject: *Re: OT Pilots for 911 Truth*


Addressing my comments concerning the recording
latency of a Loral Fairchild Model F-2100 SSFDR,

Michael Thames wrote:
> Shit Clinger even I know this!   The particular model of FDR which I
> can post upon request, has extremely high standards of accuracy,
> strict industry standards!  I happen to know the standard they meet,
> again I will post upon request. Lets just say Clinger in the realm of
> data your light years away from being close.

Accuracy is not the same thing as latency.

Accuracy is not the same thing as precision,
either.  The accuracy of the FDR's data is
limited by the accuracy of the instruments
that provide its inputs.  The FDR data for
Flight 77 are off by about 20 minutes of
longitude, 25 seconds of time, and .02g of
lateral acceleration.

These inaccuracies must be corrected using
other evidence.  That involves subjective
judgement concerning the specific external
evidence that should be used to determine
the corrections and the best mathematical
techniques to use when applying those
corrections.

On the forum controlled by Rob Basalmo, the
favored corrections are not consistent with
other evidence.  They are, after all, trying
to come up with inconsistencies that would
discredit the official story of Flight 77
flying into the Pentagon.

Other investigators favor corrections that
are more consistent with other evidence.
That is, after all, the sensible way to
proceed.

Will