Newsgroups: *rec.music.classical.guitar*
From: *William D Clinger <cesur...
Date: *Sun, 29 Jun 2008 13:25:16 -0700 (PDT)*
Subject: *Re: OT Pilots for 911 Truth*


We are now seeing Rob Balsamo's usual endgame, as documented
by threads such as the one I cited at undicisettembre.

One tactic is to admit the point (for this thread only, as he
will return to his old tricks elsewhere) while burying the
admission in a barrage of new irrelevancies and name-calling.

After denying several times that the recording latency is
computed by adding the recording interval to the buffer fill
and write times, Rob has finally decided to add the 1-second
recording interval to his 0.5 seconds:

> When any parameter is generated, regardless of
> interval, it takes less than 0.5 seconds to record to the CSMU after
> it was generated. Each parameter you see in the csv file, regardless
> of interval, was generated less than 0.5 seconds to the corresponding
> time stamp the NTSB plotted in the csv file. Which means the last
> recorded altitude in the FDR data was no more than 1.5 seconds from
> the wall...

That's progress.  For the first time in this thread, Rob has
made a mathematically possible statement about the recording
latency.

Earlier in the thread, Rob Balsamo refused to defend his cell
phone paper on the grounds that it was off topic:

> You're welcome Michael. Yes, some of these people may actually be paid
> by the Pentagon as "Bloggers" in order to sow confusion, set up
> strawmans and switch topics in order to discredit the original topic.
> Case in point, Clinger switching to the cell phone topic due to the
> fact he is unable to address the Flight Data Recorder/Press Release in
> the original post. It appears there are about 2-4 "Govt loyalists" on
> that thread who have an agenda.

He refused to be lured off topic by others as well:

> I have many more facts, but at the risk of getting off topic (which is
> probably an agenda by some here), we will stick to the original post.

Now, however, he has introduced a whole raft of new topics,
concluding with the following imperative:

> Keep repeating these questions till Will answers.

He has also told us that the Pilots for 911 Truth press releases
are an adequate substitute for peer-reviewed papers:

> We dont need to write up a simple math problem into a peer reviewed
> paper. But we did write up several press releases with our names, face
> and professional reputations signed which were distributed globally.

In the spirit of those press releases, and out of consideration
for my fellow guitarists, it may be time to move this discussion
to the joke pages of my web site.

Will